The divorce of Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt has been highly publicized and increasingly acrimonious. New revelations have recently emerged.

Keep reading to learn more about the latest developments.

A former security guard for Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie has come forward with troubling allegations against Jolie, detailing her actions during their marriage.

According to court documents obtained by the media, Pitt’s legal team claims that a former security guard named Tony Webb reported that Jolie instructed their children not to speak to Pitt during custody visits.

The documents also allege that Jolie tried to use non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) to silence the security guards about these instructions.

These documents are part of the protracted legal dispute between the ex-couple over their joint ownership of Château Miraval vineyard. This case has involved significant contention over the use of NDAs and other issues.

shutterstock

Webb, described as the “head of Jolie’s security detail for two decades,” continued in this role for about four years after the couple’s divorce. He stated that Jolie required him and his contractors to sign NDAs concerning various personal and professional aspects of her and her family’s life.

During the post-divorce custody battle over their six children, Webb claimed he “received multiple calls from Jolie’s representative,” reminding him that his staff had signed NDAs and warning that Jolie would sue them if they testified in custody proceedings. Webb conveyed this message to his contractors, who confirmed their willingness to testify if subpoenaed.

shutterstock

The documents further claim that one security contractor told Webb he would testify about overhearing Jolie telling the children to avoid spending time with Pitt during custody visits. Despite threats of being sued, the two contractors testified, leading to Webb’s company being fired by Jolie.

Webb himself did not directly hear Jolie’s directive to the children. He now works for Pitt.

shutterstock

Jolie’s attorney, Paul Murphy, addressed the media on this matter, stating, “Mr. Pitt’s continued attempt to equate common NDAs for security personnel and housekeepers covering confidential information employees learn at work, with him demanding an expanded NDA to ensure the continued coverup of his deplorable actions remains shameful. This case is not about NDAs in general, but about power and control. All Angelina has ever wanted was separation and health, with positive relationships between all members of their family, including Mr. Pitt. She looks forward to the day when he is finally able to let her go.”

This latest filing follows claims from Jolie’s lawyer that Pitt had been physically abusive toward her before the infamous 2016 plane incident, which prompted her to file for divorce.

shutterstock

In early April, Jolie’s legal team filed a motion focusing on their dispute over shares in their French winery estate, Château Miraval. They requested the court compel Pitt to provide documents explaining why he conditioned his purchase of Jolie’s share on her agreeing to a broader NDA, covering his personal misconduct beyond the scope of Miraval.

Jolie argues that Pitt’s demand for NDAs was an attempt to cover up alleged abuse against her and their children. Pitt was never charged after authorities investigated the 2016 plane incident.

shutterstock

Contrary to Jolie’s claims, Pitt’s lawyers assert that it was Jolie and her team who initially requested a broader NDA.

What are your thoughts on this situation? Share your comments and spread the update to those interested.